Home › Compare › Make alternatives
Make alternatives

The best Make.com alternatives in 2026.

Make has the most expressive hosted canvas in the category: routers, iterators and aggregators that other tools still lack. People leave it for credits that expire, a cloud-only runtime, or because they want agents rather than scenarios. Here is the option for each, and when to stay.

Try AGNT free All comparisons

Disclosure: we build AGNT, which is on this list. Every other entry is described from its maker’s own documentation and pricing page, linked below, and each one says who should pick it over us.

First Question

What are you actually trying to fix?

Each reason points at a different tool. Picking by the reason, not the brand, is how you avoid migrating twice.

If the reason is…Look at
Credits run out, or expire unusedAGNT or self-hosted n8n — no per-operation metering
The work needs local files or private networksAGNT
You want agents with memory and goals, not scenariosAGNT
You want to self-host the same visual modeln8n or Activepieces
You want the biggest connector catalogueZapier
You want a hosted AI-agent canvasGumloop
Method

How we compared them

No invented scores. Each option is described on the six questions that decide whether it fits, and every price is quoted from the vendor’s own page on 23 September 2026.

  1. Where the work runs. Your machine, your server, or a vendor’s cloud — and whether local files and private networks are reachable.
  2. How it is priced. Flat, per execution, per step or task, or per credit. The unit decides what success costs you.
  3. What the AI can do. A single AI step, an agent inside a workflow, or agents, goals and memory as first-class objects.
  4. Model freedom. One vendor’s models, several, or any provider plus local models.
  5. Control and evidence. Approval gates before consequential actions, and a record of what ran and why.
  6. Openness. Licence and whether you can self-host, inspect and leave.
The Options

8 serious options

1. AGNT

Our product

People and teams who want AI to run recurring operations on their own hardware, across any model, with approvals and a receipt for every run.

Runs
Desktop app (Windows, macOS, Linux), web and mobile via QR pairing; optional dedicated cloud instance
Pricing
Free with unlimited local runs; Personal Cloud $29/mo; Business $99/mo with 3 seats
Licence
Source available
AI capability
Agents, workflows, autonomous goals, memory, skills, MCP; delegates to Codex, Claude Code and Hermes
Watch out for
Smaller connector catalogue than the big hosted tools and a younger community — and you run the software yourself, or pay for Personal Cloud.
Download AGNT free →

2. n8n

Best for

Technical teams who want a mature, self-hostable workflow engine with an AI Agent node, priced per full execution rather than per step.

Runs
Self-hosted Community Edition, or n8n Cloud
Pricing
Self-hosted free; Cloud Starter $20/mo and Pro $50/mo billed annually; Business $800/mo
Licence
Fair-code (Sustainable Use Licence)
AI capability
First-party AI Agent node inside workflows
Watch out for
Server-first; you patch, back up and scale it yourself when self-hosting. The licence restricts reselling it as a service.
AGNT vs n8n, row by row →

3. Zapier

Best for

Non-technical teams connecting SaaS apps fast, with the largest catalogue in the category (9,000+ apps).

Runs
Hosted only
Pricing
Free (100 tasks/mo); Professional from $19.99/mo; Team from $69/mo; Agents Pro $33.33/mo billed annually
Licence
Proprietary
AI capability
Zapier Agents, AI steps, Zapier MCP
Watch out for
Every step and AI call draws from a task allowance, so cost grows with success. No access to local files or private networks.
AGNT vs Zapier, row by row →

4. Activepieces

Best for

Teams who want a Zapier-style builder they can also self-host, with flat monthly plans.

Runs
Cloud or on-prem
Pricing
Free (100 credits/day); Plus $20/mo; Team $200/mo
Licence
Source on GitHub (self-hostable)
AI capability
Flows, agents and tables with MCP support
Watch out for
Smaller catalogue and community than Zapier or n8n; heavier use moves to pay-as-you-go credits.
Visit Activepieces →

5. Gumloop

Best for

Business teams building AI agents and flows in a hosted, no-code canvas.

Runs
Hosted only
Pricing
Pro from $37/mo with a 14-day trial; Enterprise custom
Licence
Proprietary
AI capability
Unlimited agents across 35+ models
Watch out for
Cloud only, with no local or offline mode.
Visit Gumloop →

6. Hermes Agent

Best for

Technical users who want one personal agent in their chat apps that writes and improves its own skills.

Runs
Local, Docker, SSH, VPS or serverless backends
Pricing
Free; you pay your model provider (optional Nous Portal subscription)
Licence
MIT
AI capability
Self-improving agent with a learning loop, memory, cron and a messaging gateway
Watch out for
Terminal-first, single operator, no visual workflow builder.
AGNT vs Hermes Agent, row by row →

7. OpenClaw

Best for

Anyone who wants an assistant they can message from WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram or Slack, running on their own hardware.

Runs
Your own computer; native apps on macOS, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux
Pricing
Free — no paid tier
Licence
MIT, stewarded by a non-profit foundation
AI capability
Personal assistant reachable from 20+ messaging channels
Watch out for
Tools run on the host unless you configure sandboxing; no workflow canvas or graded goals.
AGNT vs OpenClaw, row by row →

8. Claude Cowork

Best for

Claude subscribers who want finished documents, spreadsheets and research with no setup.

Runs
Anthropic cloud sessions; desktop, web and mobile
Pricing
Paid Claude plans (Pro, Max, Team, Enterprise)
Licence
Proprietary
AI capability
Agentic knowledge-work tasks with scheduling and sub-agents
Watch out for
Claude models only; being merged into Claude itself.
AGNT vs Claude Cowork, row by row →
At a Glance

Every option in one table

OptionRunsPricingLicenceAI capability
AGNTDesktop app (Windows, macOS, Linux), web and mobile via QR pairing; optional dedicated cloud instanceFree with unlimited local runs; Personal Cloud $29/mo; Business $99/mo with 3 seatsSource availableAgents, workflows, autonomous goals, memory, skills, MCP; delegates to Codex, Claude Code and Hermes
n8nSelf-hosted Community Edition, or n8n CloudSelf-hosted free; Cloud Starter $20/mo and Pro $50/mo billed annually; Business $800/moFair-code (Sustainable Use Licence)First-party AI Agent node inside workflows
ZapierHosted onlyFree (100 tasks/mo); Professional from $19.99/mo; Team from $69/mo; Agents Pro $33.33/mo billed annuallyProprietaryZapier Agents, AI steps, Zapier MCP
ActivepiecesCloud or on-premFree (100 credits/day); Plus $20/mo; Team $200/moSource on GitHub (self-hostable)Flows, agents and tables with MCP support
GumloopHosted onlyPro from $37/mo with a 14-day trial; Enterprise customProprietaryUnlimited agents across 35+ models
Hermes AgentLocal, Docker, SSH, VPS or serverless backendsFree; you pay your model provider (optional Nous Portal subscription)MITSelf-improving agent with a learning loop, memory, cron and a messaging gateway
OpenClawYour own computer; native apps on macOS, iOS, Android, Windows, LinuxFree — no paid tierMIT, stewarded by a non-profit foundationPersonal assistant reachable from 20+ messaging channels
Claude CoworkAnthropic cloud sessions; desktop, web and mobilePaid Claude plans (Pro, Max, Team, Enterprise)ProprietaryAgentic knowledge-work tasks with scheduling and sub-agents

Prices as listed by each vendor on 23 September 2026; plans that bill annually are marked as such.

Staying Put

Where Make is the better choice

Routing and iteration on Make’s canvas are genuinely better than most, it connects 3,000+ apps, runs scheduled scenarios down to the minute on paid plans, and costs less per operation than Zapier. It now ships Make AI Agents (beta) and Maia for building by conversation. If you want a fully hosted visual builder, Make is hard to beat.

Reviewed 23 September 2026 against Make’s official pricing page. Every product here ships often — verify current capabilities, prices and licence terms before you choose.

Questions

Frequently asked

What is the best Make.com alternative?

For unmetered AI automation on your own hardware, AGNT. For a self-hosted visual workflow engine, n8n. For the largest catalogue, Zapier.

Do Make credits expire?

Yes. Make says credits expire at the end of the term; extra credits expire after a month on monthly plans or a year on annual Pro and Teams plans.

Is there a free Make alternative?

AGNT Community Core and self-hosted n8n run without per-operation metering. Activepieces has a free tier with 100 credits a day.

The AGNT briefing

Stay in the loop.

New agents, workflows and field notes. Sign up for AGNT updates.

By subscribing, you agree to receive AGNT updates. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy policy.