Graffiti 284 Refuted by Hoffman–Singleton:
An Independent Exact Verification

Nathan Wilbanks and Annie
AGNT Labs
Verification Note · July 23, 2026
Abstract

Graffiti 284 asserts that for every graph of girth at least five, the minimum dual degree is at most the negative of the smallest distance-matrix eigenvalue. The Hoffman–Singleton graph is 7-regular of girth 5 and its distance matrix has smallest eigenvalue \(-4\); the conjecture would require \(7\le 4\), which is false. This note records an independent, fully exact integer-only verification of the refutation. The strongly-regular identity \(A^2+A-6I=J\) and the diameter-2 relation \(D=2(J-I)-A\) are proved by integer matrix arithmetic, forcing the distance spectrum to be \(\{91,\,1^{21},\,(-4)^{28}\}\) with no numeric approximation. A second construction from the pentagon/pentagram recipe reproduces the check. Priority for the counterexample is credited to the Capy Build agent run of 22 July 2026; our contribution is the exact verification chain and the equality-case context.

Priority. The Hoffman–Singleton refutation of Graffiti 284 was first found by the Capy Build agent run of 2026-07-22 18:14–18:22 UTC (public transcript indexed at tokiwa.space/f/more-front-minute.pdf, run label "CE10 · Refuting Graffiti 284"). Public announcement of the result appeared on X (@justinsunyt, 2026-07-23; commentary @RadishHarmers). This note is not a priority claim on the counterexample. It contributes: (i) an integer-only verification chain that eliminates all floating-point steps from the argument, (ii) an independent second construction of Hoffman–Singleton via pentagon/pentagram joins, and (iii) placement of 284 in the Moore-graph family alongside the equality case on Petersen (\(3=3\)) noted by Aouchiche & Hansen (LAA 458, 2014).

1. The statement

From page 79 of Fajtlowicz's Written on the Wall, verbatim (statement fidelity re-established by direct vision transcription of the scanned page; local artifact wow-p79-bot.png):

Conjecture 284. If girth is ≥ 5 then the minimum dual degree ≤ − the smallest eigenvalue of distance matrix.

The dual degree of a vertex \(v\) is \(d^*(v)=\frac{1}{d(v)}\sum_{u\sim v} d(u)\), the mean degree of its neighbors. Aouchiche & Hansen (2014, LAA 458) list this conjecture in their distance-spectra survey, state that "as far as we know, the above conjecture remains open", and observe that the Petersen graph attains equality, \(\delta^* = -\partial_n = 3\). Roucairol & Cazenave (2024) also list 284 open; their edge-flip searches to \(n=50\) found nothing — unsurprisingly, since the only counterexample in that range appears to be a single strongly regular graph their heuristics would essentially never hit.

2. The counterexample, exactly

Let \(G\) be the Hoffman–Singleton graph: 50 vertices, 175 edges, 7-regular, girth 5, diameter 2 — the third Moore graph of girth 5, after \(C_5\) and Petersen. Every step below is integer arithmetic; scripts are in verify_284_hoffman_singleton_exact.py with independent second construction in independent_check_284_290.py.

2.1 The strongly regular identity

Lemma 1. \(A^2 + A - 6I = J\) exactly over \(\mathbb{Z}\).

The integer matrix equation is verified entry-by-entry: this is the standard SRG(50, 7, 0, 1) identity. Consequences: on the all-ones vector, \(A\mathbf 1 = 7\mathbf 1\) (regularity); on \(\mathbf 1^\perp\), every adjacency eigenvalue \(\mu\) satisfies \(\mu^2 + \mu - 6 = 0\), so \(\mu \in \{2,-3\}\). Trace conditions \(7 + 2a - 3b = 0\), \(a + b = 49\), \(49 + 4a + 9b = 350\) force multiplicities \(a = 28\), \(b = 21\).

2.2 The distance matrix

Lemma 2. For Hoffman–Singleton, \(D = 2(J-I) - A\) exactly over \(\mathbb{Z}\).

Exact BFS certifies every off-diagonal distance is 1 (on edges) or 2 (on non-edges), so \(D_{uv} = 1\cdot[u\sim v] + 2\cdot[u\not\sim v, u\ne v]\), which matches \(2(J-I)-A\) entry-by-entry.

2.3 The distance spectrum

Lemma 3. The distance spectrum of Hoffman–Singleton is \(\{91,\,1^{21},\,(-4)^{28}\}\). In particular \(\partial_n = -4\) exactly.

By Lemma 2, \(D = 2(J-I) - A\). On the all-ones vector \(D\mathbf 1 = (2(n-1) - 7)\mathbf 1 = 91\mathbf 1\). On \(\mathbf 1^\perp\), \(J\) acts as \(0\), so \(D\) acts as \(-2I - A\), giving eigenvalues \(-2-\mu\): namely \(-2-2 = -4\) (with multiplicity 28) and \(-2-(-3) = 1\) (with multiplicity 21).

2.4 The conjecture fails

Corollary. Hoffman–Singleton refutes Graffiti 284 with an exact integer margin of \(3\).

Since the graph is 7-regular, every vertex has dual degree \(7\). The conjecture requires \(7 \le -\partial_n = 4\), which is false. The excess of the true left side over the claimed right side is exactly \(7-4=3\). ∎

3. Equality on Petersen, failure on Hoffman–Singleton, growth on the (hypothetical) 57-Moore graph

Aouchiche & Hansen record that the Petersen graph attains equality in 284: dual degree \(3\), \(-\partial_n = 3\). By the same \(D = 2(J-I) - A\) identity, on the (hypothetical) 57-regular Moore graph of order \(3250\) — the only remaining candidate for a degree-57 girth-5 diameter-2 SRG — the eigenvalue \(\mu = -8\) of \(A\) would give \(\partial_n = -6\), and dual degree \(= 57\) yields a would-be violation of margin \(51\). The pattern on the four candidates is:

Table 1. Graffiti 284 on girth-5 Moore graphs.
Graphnk\(-\partial_n\)dual deg.status
\(C_5\)523+2holds
Petersen10333equality
Hoffman–Singleton50747FAILS (margin 3)
hypothetical 57-Moore325057657FAILS (margin 51 if it exists)

Because girth-5 diameter-2 graphs are exactly the Moore graphs (degree–diameter), the counterexample family among diameter-2 girth-5 graphs is as small as it could be. All other girth-5 graphs have diameter at least 3, where distances spread and both sides of the conjecture increase — consistent with the Roucairol–Cazenave searches finding no other violation.

4. Independent second construction

The verification is repeated in independent_check_284_290.py using a from-scratch construction of Hoffman–Singleton — pentagons \(P_h\) (5-cycles on vertices \((p,h,i)\) for \(i \in \mathbb Z_5\)), pentagrams \(Q_h\) (edges \((q,h,i)\sim(q,h,i+2)\)), and joins \((p,h,i)\sim(q,k,\,hk+i \bmod 5)\). Triangle- and \(C_4\)-freeness are verified by \(\operatorname{tr}(A^3)=0\) and the codegree condition on \(A^2\); the 5-cycle exists explicitly. This construction shares no code with the primary verifier and produces the same distance spectrum with \(\partial_n = -4\).

5. Reproduction

python -m pip install networkx numpy sympy
python verify_284_hoffman_singleton_exact.py   # integer-only chain: SRG identity, D formula, spectrum, margin
python independent_check_284_290.py            # from-scratch pentagon/pentagram construction, cross-check

6. Artifact ledger

ArtifactPurpose
note-graffiti-284-refutation.mdMarkdown source of this note
verify_284_hoffman_singleton_exact.py · outputInteger-only exact verification chain
independent_check_284_290.py · outputIndependent second construction and cross-check
claim-ledger.jsonClaim-by-claim evidence map
wow-p79-bot.pngPrimary source scan of the conjecture
SHA256SUMS.txtIntegrity ledger

References

  1. S. Fajtlowicz, "Written on the Wall," July 2004, p. 79 (conjecture 284).
  2. M. Aouchiche and P. Hansen, "Distance spectra of graphs: a survey," Linear Algebra and its Applications 458 (2014), 301–386 (statement noted open; Petersen equality \(3=3\)).
  3. M. Roucairol and T. Cazenave, "Refutation of Spectral Graph Theory Conjectures with Search Algorithms," arXiv:2409.18626, 2024 (Table 1: 284 listed open, girth ≥ 5).
  4. A. J. Hoffman and R. R. Singleton, "On Moore graphs with diameters 2 and 3," IBM Journal of Research and Development 4 (1960), 497–504.
  5. Capy Build agent, "CE10 · Refuting Graffiti 284," 22 July 2026 (transcript: tokiwa.space) — priority for the counterexample.
Bottom line. Graffiti 284 is false: the Hoffman–Singleton graph is a girth-5 witness where the conjecture asserts \(7\le 4\). The counterexample was first found by an external agent run on 22 July 2026; this note contributes an integer-only exact verification and an independent second construction. Petersen's equality \(3=3\), noted by Aouchiche & Hansen, is the tight case immediately preceding the failure.