Artifact Set — The Anatomy of the First Jacobian Counterexample

← Back to the paper · Report I · this page

Complete evidence set behind The Anatomy of the First Jacobian Counterexample: Torus Equivariance, an Explicit 3:1 Fold, a Weight-Forcing Rigidity Theorem, and a Graded Reduction Program for Dimension Two (AGNT Labs Technical Report II v1.0, July 21 2026). Base counterexample due to L. Alpöge and Claude Fable 5 (July 20, 2026). Everything below is exact rational/symbolic arithmetic — zero floating point.

Two-agent verification. The breakthrough/ tree is the primary construction; audit/ is the author's own adversarial deformation analysis (which produced Lemma 5 and Theorem 6); audit-sol/ is an independent sibling agent's re-derivation with different algorithms and zero shared code — including the probe that found 9 apparent counter-specimens and the gauge maps proving each is a relabeling of Alpöge's map. The v0.9→v1.0 correction forced by that audit is documented in §8 of the paper; superseded/failed instruments are retained here, not hidden.

Integrity. SHA256SUMS.txt lists a checksum for every file plus the paper itself (verify with sha256sum -c SHA256SUMS.txt from this directory).

Replication (≈15 s total, Python 3 + SymPy; the only network call is the optional HTTPS byte-audit):

cd breakthrough && python fold_anatomy.py && python forge_full.py && python forge_m45_and_foldline.py && python anatomy_and_obstruction.py && python dim2_dichotomy_and_reduction.py
cd ../audit && python audit1_reverify.py && python audit2b_weight_forcing.py && python audit3d_orbit_tangent.py && python audit3e_integrate.py
cd ../audit-sol && python audit1_core.py && python audit2_published.py && python audit5_full_gauge.py && python audit6_confirm_gauge.py

FileSizeSHA-256Description
breakthrough/ — primary construction & theorems
breakthrough/fold_anatomy.py4.4 KB75e1d6ae89941f7f…Theorem 1 (Fold): F¹⁻¹(fixed line) = axis ∪ C(s), 2:1 fold, completeness via Res_z, Gaussian fiber — 14 checks
breakthrough/forge_full.py9.7 KBdf279a0e5c96fd56…Theorems 2–3: torus equivariance, descent a=xy b=x²z, Jac = 2(3a+b−2)², fiber degree 3; Design Forge m≤3 (staged linear/quadratic solve) + Alpöge membership
breakthrough/forge_results.json3.3 KBb74324f072e103d3…Forge certificates m≤3: m=1,2 excluded; m=3 unique point, c=−2
breakthrough/forge_m45_and_foldline.py6.7 KBb7bd4b6411573366…Fold-line descent verification + forge m=4,5 exclusions + artifact hashing
breakthrough/forge_m45.json1.0 KB14154ef6f0ac3091…m=4,5 exclusion certificates (stage-1 linear layer empty at all caps)
breakthrough/anatomy_and_obstruction.py5.4 KB432a416ca236e121…Mechanisms I–III (z-affinity, Z/2 equivariance, orbit-collision) + dim-2 z-affine obstruction theorem
breakthrough/dim2_dichotomy_and_reduction.py6.9 KB715d0183718b01d6…Dim-2 export: reflection-equivariant dichotomy, quotient identity, reduction equation u·Jac(H,K)²=c²K, first sweep
breakthrough/dim2_sweep.json0.8 KB6a4293b98d5aca49…Reduction-equation exclusion certificates (5 nonconstant g-shapes, deg H≤4)
breakthrough/dc1_hunter.py4.9 KBa80369ec239712e6…Exact normal-ordered Weyl algebra A₁ engine (self-tested) + DC₁ sweep 1
breakthrough/dc1_sweep1.json0.5 KBac5bcbc7300f3d25…DC₁ sweep 1: 144 sparse two-term patterns, filtration ≤4 — zero nontrivial commuting pairs
breakthrough/dc1_parity_sweep.py2.7 KBa64f9538a5b55edf…DC₁ sweep 2: parity-equivariant ansatz (Mechanism II seed)
breakthrough/dc1_sweep2_parity.json0.1 KB16711745f5180184…DC₁ sweep 2 certificate: 100 patterns, zero nontrivial pairs
breakthrough/breakthrough_hashes.json1.1 KBe6936d57d5567585…SHA-256 manifest of the breakthrough set
audit/ — author's adversarial deformation analysis (Lemma 5, Theorem 6)
audit/audit1_reverify.py5.0 KB6f6148cb8002c15e…Re-verification of Theorems 1–3 from a fresh raw encoding + Gröbner quotient-dimension cross-check of the Degree Theorem (different algorithm)
audit/audit1.json1.0 KBe3eb45b615736c4b…Audit-1 verdicts (ALL PASS)
audit/audit2_weight_forcing.py2.3 KBe154a3d19033f056…Weight-forcing lemma, first staging (superseded by audit2b; retained for transparency)
audit/audit2b_weight_forcing.py1.5 KB98780c0b46e1ef28…LEMMA 5 (Weight-Forcing): residual homogeneity constraint = (3−m)·w_x — slope power 3 structurally forced
audit/audit3_deformation.py6.1 KB362bd2a3c0a0be25…Full-class (slope-free, 19+1 unknowns) Keller linearization at Alpöge: dim ker = 6, first trivial-span comparison
audit/audit3.json2.0 KBb41bc19a0e9794fa…Audit-3 kernel data
audit/audit3b_deformation.py4.5 KB4de95adef587fee2…Deformation pass 2: combined pre-y/post-F2 gauge direction identified
audit/audit3b.json0.3 KBdcb0585d63f08925…Audit-3b verdicts
audit/audit3c_close_kernel.py5.4 KB76b1932077cac09b…Deformation pass 3: all graded-gauge shear generators linearized
audit/audit3c.json0.3 KB43e13fd5dad5f793…Audit-3c verdicts
audit/audit3c_family.py8.8 KB542acc4798e396f1…Exploratory kernel-direction probe (superseded by 3d/3e; retained)
audit/audit3d_orbit_tangent.py4.6 KBaf4130c15846d92e…Gauge-orbit tangent via Lie-algebra action: rank 5 inside dim-6 kernel
audit/audit3d.json0.2 KB1aab9934d9bb65dd…Audit-3d verdicts
audit/audit3e_integrate.py6.4 KB013cc6470cf8b3b6…THEOREM 6 decisive test: the lone non-gauge direction is SECOND-ORDER OBSTRUCTED (det J = −2 + O(s²), monomial x⁷y³z² coeff −s²/8)
audit/audit3e.json0.4 KB1df7083f6de182dc…Audit-3e verdict: OBSTRUCTED — rigidity holds
audit/audit_all_hashes.json2.7 KB42a38a697b494f71…SHA-256 manifest of both audit sets
audit-sol/ — independent sibling-agent audit (zero shared code)
audit-sol/audit1_core.py5.5 KB57bb85648c4b5729…SOL (independent sibling agent, zero shared code): re-derivation of Theorems 1–4 + Dixmier witness by different algorithms — 18/18
audit-sol/audit1_verdicts.json1.8 KB2320d77ef2fc2b0d…Sol audit-1 verdicts
audit-sol/audit2_published.py3.7 KB70dee4ab6b92e167…SOL: HTTPS byte-verification of the published Report I artifact set against SHA256SUMS (15/15) + re-verification of served objects
audit-sol/audit2_verdicts.json0.9 KB8d6f944f242b9cf5…Sol audit-2 verdicts
audit-sol/audit3_rigidity.py8.0 KB3768653729a54c8e…SOL adversarial probe: y-normalization freed, truly-equivariant slope class swept — 9 apparent new specimens found
audit-sol/audit3_results.json62.9 KBe8ca08785f9cbb52…Sol probe data (the specimens that forced the v0.9 correction)
audit-sol/audit4_gauge.py5.0 KB5573df109b4731a0…SOL: diagonal-gauge test (insufficient alone — motivates full graded gauge)
audit-sol/audit4_verdicts.json2.1 KB007b9d8ffc46c71e…Sol audit-4 verdicts
audit-sol/audit5_full_gauge.py5.2 KB08de2a80c4d24e3f…SOL: full graded gauge group (scalings + equivariant shears) — all 5 representative specimens gauge-equivalent to Alpöge
audit-sol/audit5_verdicts.json0.4 KBae0e3f758e735962…Sol audit-5 verdicts (5/5 equivalent)
audit-sol/audit6_confirm_gauge.py1.7 KB93b3b7a97bbe9dd7…SOL: one gauge equivalence confirmed by DIRECT SUBSTITUTION: T∘F∘S = specimen with S=(x,y,−z), T=(−Y₁, Y₂/3, Y₃); det −2/3 proves c is not gauge-invariant
audit-sol/audit_hashes.json1.0 KB6347c7affe9e930b…SHA-256 manifest of the Sol audit set

Paper integrity. SHA-256 of the published paper:
85ad5a9bff460336bd4a6da0221ed7e9ff2c66e49a243f565500dfa0a5187a56

AGNT Labs · Technical Report II v1.0 artifacts · Published 2026-07-21 · Expert human review solicited — this set exists so review requires no trust in the authors